<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMI Racing DB10R Pro-10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/</link>
	<description>Welcome to Red RC - RC Car product news, views and race results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdrianM</title>
		<link>http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/comment-page-1/#comment-41912</link>
		<dc:creator>AdrianM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/#comment-41912</guid>
		<description>Well, the car uses standard parts but the chassis lay out is a new concept and the rear suspension is all new.

We will see how it performs when it comes out.  So far it look fast just sitting there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the car uses standard parts but the chassis lay out is a new concept and the rear suspension is all new.</p>
<p>We will see how it performs when it comes out.  So far it look fast just sitting there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimihiko-yano.net</title>
		<link>http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/comment-page-1/#comment-41880</link>
		<dc:creator>kimihiko-yano.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/#comment-41880</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BMI DB10R Pro-10&lt;/strong&gt;

パートナーサイトRED R/CではアメリカBMI社が発売予定のPRO10シャーシの画像がアップされています。写真は４セル仕様ですが7.4V LIPOバッテリーの搭載もできる模様。リアサスの構成は同社の...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BMI DB10R Pro-10</strong></p>
<p>パートナーサイトRED R/CではアメリカBMI社が発売予定のPRO10シャーシの画像がアップされています。写真は４セル仕様ですが7.4V LIPOバッテリーの搭載もできる模様。リアサスの構成は同社の&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCeasy » BMI Racing - DB10R Pro-10</title>
		<link>http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/comment-page-1/#comment-41876</link>
		<dc:creator>RCeasy » BMI Racing - DB10R Pro-10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/#comment-41876</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: BMI &amp; RedRC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: BMI &amp; RedRC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bellville</title>
		<link>http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/comment-page-1/#comment-41875</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bellville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrc.net/2008/02/bmi-racing-db10r-pro-10/#comment-41875</guid>
		<description>I admit I like the idea of pan chassis coming back, but this should not be called Pro-10 as the class was 6-cell onroad and raced primarily on paved tracks.  Secondly I was wondering how this is so revolutionary compared to the old &quot;real&quot; pro 10 cars, last I remember and I have it in front of me, my RC10L2 (235mm) has a dynamic strut front end which came stock, Irrgang racing rear axle and diff setup, etc.  My Roadstar although overweight had its T-plate less rear pod with tweak setup.  Not to mention the awesome Yokomo YRX 2000 / YRX 10 Chassis.  Or the Capable Trinity EV-10.   Both of which had central mount Battery trays.  This is a 190mm pan chassis, the like of the original CRC Pantoura (also a 4 cell chassis).  I am all for bring Pro 10 back, just don&#039;t call these 190mm chassis Pro-10.  A real Pro 10 (235) would mop the floor with one of these.  Just my two cents worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit I like the idea of pan chassis coming back, but this should not be called Pro-10 as the class was 6-cell onroad and raced primarily on paved tracks.  Secondly I was wondering how this is so revolutionary compared to the old &#8220;real&#8221; pro 10 cars, last I remember and I have it in front of me, my RC10L2 (235mm) has a dynamic strut front end which came stock, Irrgang racing rear axle and diff setup, etc.  My Roadstar although overweight had its T-plate less rear pod with tweak setup.  Not to mention the awesome Yokomo YRX 2000 / YRX 10 Chassis.  Or the Capable Trinity EV-10.   Both of which had central mount Battery trays.  This is a 190mm pan chassis, the like of the original CRC Pantoura (also a 4 cell chassis).  I am all for bring Pro 10 back, just don&#8217;t call these 190mm chassis Pro-10.  A real Pro 10 (235) would mop the floor with one of these.  Just my two cents worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

